<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Allow multi-column sorting in Table and Matrix visuals in Fabric Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Fabric-Ideas/Allow-multi-column-sorting-in-Table-and-Matrix-visuals/idi-p/5136372</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Description:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Currently, Table and Matrix visuals in Power BI only allow sorting by one column at a time. It would be extremely useful to support multi-column sorting, similar to an ORDER BY clause in SQL.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Practical example:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In a driver ranking table, I would like to:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Show first the drivers who have already reached the target, sorted by bonus achieved&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Then show the drivers who have not reached the target yet, sorted by remaining value to target&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Today, the only workaround is to create helper columns or DAX measures that combine multiple sorting rules into a single expression. While this can work, it makes the model more complex, less flexible, and harder to maintain.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Suggested improvement:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Allow Table and Matrix visuals to support multi-level sorting, for example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;1st sort: Bonus Achieved (descending)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;2nd sort: Remaining Value (ascending)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;3rd sort: Driver Name (ascending)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Possible ways this could work:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Shift + click to add additional sort levels&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;A sorting pane inside the visual&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Manual setup of sort priority and direction for each field&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Benefits:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Reduces the need for helper measures created only for sorting&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Makes models simpler and easier to maintain&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Gives users more control over rankings and operational lists&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Creates a more intuitive experience for users familiar with SQL, Excel, and other analytics tools&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Use cases:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Rankings with tie-breakers&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Lists mixing achieved and not achieved targets&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Operational prioritization&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Financial and commercial classifications&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Hierarchical ordering in Matrix visuals&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 12:47:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Gepax</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-03-20T12:47:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Allow multi-column sorting in Table and Matrix visuals</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Fabric-Ideas/Allow-multi-column-sorting-in-Table-and-Matrix-visuals/idi-p/5136372</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Description:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Currently, Table and Matrix visuals in Power BI only allow sorting by one column at a time. It would be extremely useful to support multi-column sorting, similar to an ORDER BY clause in SQL.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Practical example:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In a driver ranking table, I would like to:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Show first the drivers who have already reached the target, sorted by bonus achieved&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Then show the drivers who have not reached the target yet, sorted by remaining value to target&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Today, the only workaround is to create helper columns or DAX measures that combine multiple sorting rules into a single expression. While this can work, it makes the model more complex, less flexible, and harder to maintain.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Suggested improvement:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Allow Table and Matrix visuals to support multi-level sorting, for example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;1st sort: Bonus Achieved (descending)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;2nd sort: Remaining Value (ascending)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;3rd sort: Driver Name (ascending)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Possible ways this could work:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Shift + click to add additional sort levels&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;A sorting pane inside the visual&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Manual setup of sort priority and direction for each field&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Benefits:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Reduces the need for helper measures created only for sorting&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Makes models simpler and easier to maintain&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Gives users more control over rankings and operational lists&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Creates a more intuitive experience for users familiar with SQL, Excel, and other analytics tools&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Use cases:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Rankings with tie-breakers&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Lists mixing achieved and not achieved targets&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Operational prioritization&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Financial and commercial classifications&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Hierarchical ordering in Matrix visuals&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 12:47:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Fabric-Ideas/Allow-multi-column-sorting-in-Table-and-Matrix-visuals/idi-p/5136372</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gepax</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-20T12:47:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

