Automatically validate Dataflow Gen2 after deployment
Please fix this, so the Dataflow will get validated automatically after syncing changes from Git or using deployment pipelines:
"When you sync changes from GIT into the workspace or use deployment pipelines, you need to open the new or updated dataflow and save changes manually with the editor. This triggers a publish action in the background to allow the changes to be used during refresh of your dataflow. You can also use the on-demand Dataflow publish job API call to automate the publish operation."
Because this currently doesn't happen automatically, it causes confusion, unnecessary manual work, and often we forget this and therefore get unexpected results when running the dataflow.
5 Comments
- miguelCommunity AdminStatus changed:CompletedtoPlanned
- surpriseturtleFrequent VisitorYes, this is sorely needed. The errors do not point to the need to publish either so a lot of users must have gone through this experience and struggled to figure out the root cause.
- miguelCommunity AdminStatus changed:PlannedtoCompleted
After deploying a Dataflow, you can trigger a run / refresh of the Dataflow and it'll work without any interaction within the Dataflow editor.
- frithjof_vCommunity ChampionThat is fantastic news 🤩 Thanks!
- AdeV-OlyAdvocate I
With the recent change, triggering a Dataflow Gen2 refresh directly from the workspace after deployment is now possible, without first opening and saving the dataflow in the editor. This is a clear step forward compared to the previous experience.
However, there are still some gaps that make the process feel only partially complete:
First, the validation/publish step is not fully integrated into the deployment process itself. As a result, deployment alone does not leave the dataflow in a fully validated and consistent state.
Second, this becomes more visible through an inconsistency in the UI. After deployment, if a refresh is manually triggered from the workspace:
… > Check validation correctly shows:
- Validation Succeeded
- An updated validation timestamp
But in contrast, the workspace list (Status column) continues to display an outdated validation state and timestamp.
This creates a mismatch between the detailed validation view and the workspace overview, making it difficult to trust the Status column as a reliable indicator of the current validation state.
miguel
Edited style
Recent ideas
Allow External OneLake Data Shares to Be Accepted into Multiple Fabric Item Types
Fabric External Data Sharing provides an excellent zero-copy mechanism for sharing OneLake data across tenants. However, the receiving tenant currently has to accept the share into a Lakehouse. I w...Mourak4 hours agoNew MemberNew1View0likes0CommentsAllow OneLake Shortcut Authentication Mode to Be Changed In Place
OneLake shortcuts support passthrough and delegated authentication, but changing the authentication model currently requires deleting and recreating the shortcut. I would like shortcut authenticatio...Mourak4 hours agoNew MemberNew3Views0likes0CommentsTenant-Wide OneLake Shortcut Lineage and Impact Analysis
This is grounded in a documented limitation: shortcut lineage is currently workspace-scoped, and Microsoft specifically says lineage for shortcuts to warehouses and semantic models isn't currently av...Mourak4 hours agoNew MemberNew2Views0likes1CommentAdd an End-to-End Production Reference Architecture for Microsoft Fabric Real-Time Intelligence
I would like to see a complete end-to-end Microsoft Fabric Real-Time Intelligence reference architecture that demonstrates how the individual RTI capabilities work together in a production-oriented s...Mourak4 hours agoNew MemberNew1View0likes0CommentsImprove CI/CD consistency for Microsoft Fabric Real-Time Intelligence Eventstreams
Microsoft Fabric Real-Time Intelligence has made strong progress with Git integration and deployment pipelines, but lifecycle management can still be inconsistent across Eventstream sources, destinat...Mourak4 hours agoNew MemberNew1View0likes0Comments