Forum Discussion
Implicit filters remove all records?
I've been working on an example from another user. I was initially answerring a question, till I bumped into some weird behavior of Power BI. Source table of the pitched problem:
Request was to have a table with country on rows and on columns users. Then he wanted a value of 'Yes' when the combination exists and 'No' when it doesn't. The solution for him was with a twist as 'blank' was sufficient as a 'No'. Just like below:
But I wanted more. I wanted the 'No' on the blank values. So I continued. So I followed up with:
So my colleague suggested to state all return values as "No" to test the context.
And I was like
So apparently when implicit filters (including those from the filter pane) create a context of 0 records, whatever you do with explicit filters or via a DAX expression, will always remain 0. This way when calculation a countrows on an all('table') returns only values when the implicit filters have a context base larger than 0.
So to screw with my brain even further, first a basic countrows with a filter on 'Country'[Country]:
And now changing the context to an all statement for the countrows:
So basically I have only 1 question. What do I need to do to make sure everywhere in this matrix with this source data the blank values are replaced with "No".
12 Replies
- DouweMeer
Impactful Individual
**bleep** happens when you find something quirky. You can't get away with just but a statement 😁.
Did tried yours, however the statement =blank() does actually work. See below.
- AnonymousNot applicable
Hi I would like to test it on my side and if you could share the pbix it would be better.
I haven't read it everything, but probably when the intercept of two different tables has a blank the measure is blank and therefore your measure is "No" only when you have resulting rows rather thank BLANK()- AnonymousNot applicable
(in any case I gave you one kudo just for the style of the post 🙂 )