Forum Discussion

MattJacob's avatar
MattJacob
Frequent Visitor
2 years ago
Solved

Create a transitioning table between two selected dates

Hello, 

 

I would like to track movements in statuses from our cases.

So therefore I would like to create a status transitioning table between two selected dates. 

 

I have a dataset with among which three colums:

Date

Case ID

Status

 

We have >10.000 Cases and ~10 statuses.

 

I would like to create an output like this

 

Table           Status1                Status2            Status3       ...

Status1           A                         B                       C

Status2           D                         E                       F

Status3            G                         H                     I

...

 

Where A is the number of cases that were in Status1 at the first selected date and at status1 at the second selected date.

Where F is the number of cases that were in Status2 at the first selected date and at status3 at the second selected date.

Where G is the number of cases that were in Status3 at the first selected date and at status1 at the second selected date.

So cases can go forwards and backwards.

 

I have looked everywhere to create this.

 

Can you help me?

 

Thanks you very much!

 

  • Anonymous's avatar
    Anonymous
    2 years ago

    Hi MattJacob ,

     

    I suggest you to create unrelated dimtables to help your calculation.

    The relationship between these tables are all inactive.

    Measure:

    Count =
    VAR _GEN1 =
        GENERATE ( 'Status(Row)', 'Status(Column)' )
    VAR _GEN2 =
        GENERATE ( _GEN1, VALUES ( 'Table'[Case ID] ) )
    VAR _SELECT1 =
        SELECTEDVALUE ( DimDate1[Date] )
    VAR _SELECT2 =
        SELECTEDVALUE ( DimDate2[Date] )
    VAR _ADDFlag =
        ADDCOLUMNS (
            _GEN2,
            "Flag",
                VAR _1 =
                    CALCULATE (
                        MAX ( 'Table'[Status] ),
                        FILTER (
                            'Table',
                            'Table'[Case ID] = EARLIER ( [Case ID] )
                                && 'Table'[Date] = _SELECT1
                        )
                    )
                VAR _2 =
                    CALCULATE (
                        MAX ( 'Table'[Status] ),
                        FILTER (
                            'Table',
                            'Table'[Case ID] = EARLIER ( [Case ID] )
                                && 'Table'[Date] = _SELECT2
                        )
                    )
                RETURN
                    IF ( [Status(Row)] = _1 && [Status(Column)] = _2, 1, 0 )
        )
    VAR _FILTER =
        FILTER ( _ADDFlag, [Flag] = 1 )
    VAR _SUMX =
        ADDCOLUMNS (
            _GEN1,
            "Sumx",
                SUMX (
                    FILTER (
                        _FILTER,
                        [Status(Row)] = EARLIER ( [Status(Row)] )
                            && [Status(Column)] = EARLIER ( [Status(Column)] )
                    ),
                    [Flag]
                )
        )
    RETURN
        SUMX ( _SUMX, [Sumx] )

    Result is as below.

     

    Best Regards,
    Rico Zhou

     

    If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.

     

3 Replies

  • If this is coming from SFDC data then it will be much easier to use the field history object for the case object. It records all these transitions automatically.

     

    otherwise, Please provide sample data (with sensitive information removed) that covers your issue or question completely, in a usable format (not as a screenshot). Leave out anything not related to the issue.
    https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Community-Blog/How-to-provide-sample-data-in-the-Power-BI-Forum/ba-p/963216
    Please show the expected outcome based on the sample data you provided.

    https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Desktop/How-to-Get-Your-Question-Answered-Quickly/m-p/1447523

  • Anonymous's avatar
    Anonymous
    Not applicable

    Hi MattJacob ,

     

    I suggest you to create unrelated dimtables to help your calculation.

    The relationship between these tables are all inactive.

    Measure:

    Count =
    VAR _GEN1 =
        GENERATE ( 'Status(Row)', 'Status(Column)' )
    VAR _GEN2 =
        GENERATE ( _GEN1, VALUES ( 'Table'[Case ID] ) )
    VAR _SELECT1 =
        SELECTEDVALUE ( DimDate1[Date] )
    VAR _SELECT2 =
        SELECTEDVALUE ( DimDate2[Date] )
    VAR _ADDFlag =
        ADDCOLUMNS (
            _GEN2,
            "Flag",
                VAR _1 =
                    CALCULATE (
                        MAX ( 'Table'[Status] ),
                        FILTER (
                            'Table',
                            'Table'[Case ID] = EARLIER ( [Case ID] )
                                && 'Table'[Date] = _SELECT1
                        )
                    )
                VAR _2 =
                    CALCULATE (
                        MAX ( 'Table'[Status] ),
                        FILTER (
                            'Table',
                            'Table'[Case ID] = EARLIER ( [Case ID] )
                                && 'Table'[Date] = _SELECT2
                        )
                    )
                RETURN
                    IF ( [Status(Row)] = _1 && [Status(Column)] = _2, 1, 0 )
        )
    VAR _FILTER =
        FILTER ( _ADDFlag, [Flag] = 1 )
    VAR _SUMX =
        ADDCOLUMNS (
            _GEN1,
            "Sumx",
                SUMX (
                    FILTER (
                        _FILTER,
                        [Status(Row)] = EARLIER ( [Status(Row)] )
                            && [Status(Column)] = EARLIER ( [Status(Column)] )
                    ),
                    [Flag]
                )
        )
    RETURN
        SUMX ( _SUMX, [Sumx] )

    Result is as below.

     

    Best Regards,
    Rico Zhou

     

    If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.