Forum Discussion
Augmenting data by week
Hi all,
I have a table like that
PERIOD PLANT TYPE
201801 A X
201801 B Y
Actually the table and values not important. I want to make some change on my table. I need to augment the data like that.
PERIOD PLANT TYPE
20180101 A X
20180102 A X
20180103 A X
20180104 A X
20180101 B Y
20180102 B Y
20180103 B Y
20180104 B Y
I don't have to access to actual data (source is access) because of that i have to make that on power bi. Is it possible ? If is it possible how can i do that ?
Thanks.
A.
if you just need 52 weeks for each entry then it's simple:
1) in the query editor add a new column (name it WeekNr) with this syntax:
{1..52}2) expand the values to rows
3) create a new column which is
[Period]*100+[WeekNr]
4) remove unnecessary columns
EDIT what I don't get is that you say that you want it as in real calendar - if that's the case why do you need week 51 for 201201 which to me seems to be January 2012? it only had 5 weeks at most. Or is it not related to month?
3 Replies
- StachuCommunity Champion
you can do it in the query editor - do you always assume 4 weeks in a month or does it have to be related to the real calendar weeks? How do you want to show split weeks i.e. weeks that fall into 2 months?
- AnonymousNot applicable
This table doesn't display the requested data. I create it for just show. It's demo.
I have a period column which start 201201 to today (201811 -always last month ) and i want to augment it for 52 weeks. In summary i want to multiply each row data with 52 weeks. I want it like real calendar
For example
Period : 201201
20120101
20120102
.
.
.
20120151
20120152
Actually i don't know how to do in query editor- StachuCommunity Champion
if you just need 52 weeks for each entry then it's simple:
1) in the query editor add a new column (name it WeekNr) with this syntax:
{1..52}2) expand the values to rows
3) create a new column which is
[Period]*100+[WeekNr]
4) remove unnecessary columns
EDIT what I don't get is that you say that you want it as in real calendar - if that's the case why do you need week 51 for 201201 which to me seems to be January 2012? it only had 5 weeks at most. Or is it not related to month?