Forum Discussion
Dataflow in pipeline succeeds but does nothing
I figured out what the issue was: it's the general unclear behavior with Dataflows with closing vs publishing.
When you exit out of the Dataflow editor, you think it's saving your latest changes because when you go back you will see the most recent state. But in fact it saved the previous state, and you can't save a Dataflow without running it.
This means that if you are doing a fetch+append data on a weekly or monthly basis, which is what I am doing, you have to wait until the last day of your time window to publish your Dataflow, and only then can you enable the auto-run schedule.
Hello DCELL ,
As per my understanding, you have a dataflow that successfully appends data to your Fabric Data Lake when you run it manually. But when you trigger the same dataflow through a pipeline (either scheduled or manually), it says it ran successfully , yet no data is actually appended. Since, You have already confirmed this isn’t due to SQL endpoint delays by checking max date and row counts.
There might be a few possible reasons that causing the issue :
- The dataflow might be running early inside the pipeline activity, before the data it's supposed to fetch is ready. Please try to add a Wait step in your pipeline to delay the dataflow by 1–2 minutes. Make sure the dataflow step only runs after the required steps are complete.
- The dataflow might be overwriting or skipping the append due to how it’s configured. Pleas double check the destination setting is "Append" only , not "Replace". Please Turn off "Auto create table" option, which sometimes causes the dataflow to create a new table instead of appending to the existing role.
- Sometimes, when dataflows are run through pipelines, they don’t use the latest or correct credentials. Please try to reconnect or reauthenticate your data source. Also clear the cached credentials and Refresh.
- If the incoming data doesn’t match the existing table’s schema, it might silently fail to append. Please make sure the columns and data types match exactly. Please try to avoid using special characters or spaces in table names.
If this post helps, then please consider Accepting as solution to help the other members find it more quickly, don't forget to give a "Kudos" – I’d truly appreciate it! |
Regards,
B Manikanteswara Reddy
Hi DCELL ,
We wanted to kindly follow up to check if the solution provided for the issue worked? or Let us know if you need any further assistance?
If our response addressed, please mark it as Accept as solution and click Yes if you found it helpful.
|
Please don't forget to give a "Kudos " – I’d truly appreciate it! |
Regards,
B Manikanteswara Reddy
Hi DCELL ,
As we haven’t heard back from you, we wanted to kindly follow up to check if the solution provided for the issue worked? or Let us know if you need any further assistance?
If our response addressed, please mark it as Accept as solution and click Yes if you found it helpful.
Please don't forget to give a "Kudos " – I’d truly appreciate it!
Regards,
B Manikanteswara Reddy
Hello, I've gone through the list and the issue must have been something else.
-The data was already ready
-The dataflow configuration is correct; when running the dataflow without the pipeline it worked. Only when that exact same dataflow is in a pipeline does it 'succeed' but without any effect
-Credentials - but wouldn't the dataflow in the pipeline simply fail in this case if the credentials aren't up to date?
-Schema is correct. The dataflow works outside of a pipeline, but not when inside a pipeline