Forum Discussion
binitafulpagare
Kudo Commander
2 months agoSQL Strategy
Hi everyone, With the growing number of database technologies available, I'm curious how organizations decide which database should support different workloads. When working with Microsoft Fabric, ...
- 2 months ago
Great question here is the approach I recommend based on my knowledge:
Keep data in the operational database when:
- Sub-second latency and high write concurrency are required.
- Strong ACID and application-enforced row-level security are non-negotiable.
- Workloads are transactional and customer-facing.
Move or mirror into Fabric when:
- Workloads are analytical (scans, aggregations, historical trends).
- Data from multiple sources needs to be blended for BI or ML.
- A governed semantic layer on OneLake (Direct Lake + Power BI) is needed.
- Long-term retention or cross-domain sharing via Purview is in scope.
Choose the integration pattern by latency:
- Near real-time ->Fabric Mirroring (Azure SQL, Cosmos DB, Snowflake, PostgreSQL)
- Streaming -> Eventstream / Real-Time Intelligence
- Minutes–hourly -> Dataflows Gen2 / Pipelines
- Data already in ADLS/S3/GCS 0 -> OneLake Shortcuts (virtualize, don't copy)
Key principles:
- Keep one copy of truth in OneLake, let Warehouse, Lakehouse, KQL, and Power BI read the same data.
- Never run analytics directly on production OLTP.
- Prefer Mirroring and Shortcuts over ETL wherever supported.
- Govern centrally through OneLake and Purview.
In short: operational databases run the business; Fabric analyzes it. The decision comes down to workload type, latency SLA, and integration method.
Thank you.
Srikanth Cheri
CST Team.
v-csrikanth
Community Support
1 month agoWe haven’t heard from you on the last response and was just checking back to see if you have a resolution yet. And, if you have any further query do let us know.
Thank you.