Forum Discussion

fionalindberrg's avatar
fionalindberrg
Regular Visitor
1 month ago
Solved

DP700 - Failed first attempt. MS practice exam not close to being representative of the complexity

Hi Data Engineers,

 

I'm hoping you can give me some guidance. I'm PL300 and DP600 certified, and I passed both exams fairly easily on my first attempt. They're a bit more in my day-to-day wheelhouse. Having said that, I studied for weeks and did repeated practice exams on Microsoft's own website. I was routinely getting high 80%s to mid 90%s pass rates, so I went into yesterday's exam feeling quite confident.

 

Ugh, I got mid 600s. I was disappointed of course. The were many questions that required multipart answers, and complex dataframe and KQL coding questions. That's on me. A focus area is to get more hands-on experience building out notebooks, etc. 

 

My real question is, has anyone else experienced this big a disconnect between the MS practice exams and actual exam. The DP600 I felt like the practice exams were very representative of the actual exam, and no big surprises. I wonder if I had some beta exam questions. They seemed to pick fairly edge case stuff like the code to get secrets out of Azure into a notebook. I've since realized I need to research notebookutils. Again, I know I have work to do, but where can I find REPRESENTATIVE exam questions for the DP700. I hope to learn for a few more months, and retake it.

  • hey fionalindberrg I actually had a similar experience, found it really difficult to pass D-700 (luckily I barely pass with just slightly over 700 points).

    I feel that he Microsoft practice assessment (while useful to get started) the real exam tends to be much more complex. Coming to the exam, you should expect more scenario-based questions where several answers may appear reasonable and you need to select the best implementation. The exam also heavily tests "practical hands on" Fabric Data Engineering skills rather than just theory.
    I saw significantly more questions around KQL / Eventhouse / Real-Time Intelligence (which surprised me) then PySpark DataFrames, notebooks, pipelines / orchestration and data security / authentication patterns.

    As such, with the spirit of being "hands-on", I would recommend these other options to study:

    Good luck!

    Appreciate if you can "Kudos" and/or "Accept as Solution" if this answered your query.

  • Hi fionalindberrg,

     

    Please don't get discouraged. The fact that you are certified in PL 300 and DP 600 is a great thing. 

     

    Im by no means marketing anything but I followed Phillip Burton's course and some practice tests on Udemy. I agree that the MS practice exam are not similar to the actual exam. So please check other options. 

     

    If you like my response please give a kudos. Please accept as a solution if I have answered you. 

     

    Best Regards,

    Rajesh

  • Hi fionalindberrg 

     

    I would highly recommend making sure that you have got hands on experience as that can often help you with regards to the questions to understand what they are actually asking when you have the experience required.

  • Hey, sorry to hear that — that gap between practice scores and actual result is genuinely frustrating, especially when DP600 tracked so well for you.

     

    You're definitely not alone on this one. A lot of people say DP700's official practice test feels noticeably less representative than DP600's — it leans multiple choice/recall, while the real exam pushes way more into hands-on notebook code, PySpark/Spark SQL syntax, and yes, notebookutils and secret scopes/mssparkutils-style stuff that barely shows up in the practice questions. So it's not just you — the exam samples real hands-on skill more than the prep material does.

     

    For better prep:

    • Just build stuff. Spin up notebooks in a trial Fabric workspace and actually write the code — reading secrets from Key Vault via notebookutils.credentials, mounting/reading from lakehouses, Spark SQL vs PySpark for the same transform, etc. Muscle memory beats memorizing.
      • MS Learn's DP-700 learning path has sandbox exercises — actually do them, don't just skim.
      • Look up John Savill's DP-700 study videos on YouTube — solid at bridging the "exam trivia" vs "real skill" gap.
      • KQL: practice directly in the Kusto query playground, not just theory.

        Good sign you're already zeroing in on notebookutils as a gap — that's exactly the kind of thing that trips people up. A few months of actually building things in a Fabric trial workspace should close it. Good luck on the retake!

        Thanks, and good luck!
        Proud to be a Fabric Super User 🙂


11 Replies

  • Hey, sorry to hear that — that gap between practice scores and actual result is genuinely frustrating, especially when DP600 tracked so well for you.

     

    You're definitely not alone on this one. A lot of people say DP700's official practice test feels noticeably less representative than DP600's — it leans multiple choice/recall, while the real exam pushes way more into hands-on notebook code, PySpark/Spark SQL syntax, and yes, notebookutils and secret scopes/mssparkutils-style stuff that barely shows up in the practice questions. So it's not just you — the exam samples real hands-on skill more than the prep material does.

     

    For better prep:

    • Just build stuff. Spin up notebooks in a trial Fabric workspace and actually write the code — reading secrets from Key Vault via notebookutils.credentials, mounting/reading from lakehouses, Spark SQL vs PySpark for the same transform, etc. Muscle memory beats memorizing.
      • MS Learn's DP-700 learning path has sandbox exercises — actually do them, don't just skim.
      • Look up John Savill's DP-700 study videos on YouTube — solid at bridging the "exam trivia" vs "real skill" gap.
      • KQL: practice directly in the Kusto query playground, not just theory.

        Good sign you're already zeroing in on notebookutils as a gap — that's exactly the kind of thing that trips people up. A few months of actually building things in a Fabric trial workspace should close it. Good luck on the retake!

        Thanks, and good luck!
        Proud to be a Fabric Super User 🙂


  • hey fionalindberrg I actually had a similar experience, found it really difficult to pass D-700 (luckily I barely pass with just slightly over 700 points).

    I feel that he Microsoft practice assessment (while useful to get started) the real exam tends to be much more complex. Coming to the exam, you should expect more scenario-based questions where several answers may appear reasonable and you need to select the best implementation. The exam also heavily tests "practical hands on" Fabric Data Engineering skills rather than just theory.
    I saw significantly more questions around KQL / Eventhouse / Real-Time Intelligence (which surprised me) then PySpark DataFrames, notebooks, pipelines / orchestration and data security / authentication patterns.

    As such, with the spirit of being "hands-on", I would recommend these other options to study:

    Good luck!

    Appreciate if you can "Kudos" and/or "Accept as Solution" if this answered your query.

    • fionalindberrg's avatar
      fionalindberrg
      Regular Visitor

      Thanks so much for the resources. I will check these out. I think 6 months of me more "hands on" and some better practice exams, I'll pass next attempt. 🙂

  • Hi fionalindberrg,

     

    Please don't get discouraged. The fact that you are certified in PL 300 and DP 600 is a great thing. 

     

    Im by no means marketing anything but I followed Phillip Burton's course and some practice tests on Udemy. I agree that the MS practice exam are not similar to the actual exam. So please check other options. 

     

    If you like my response please give a kudos. Please accept as a solution if I have answered you. 

     

    Best Regards,

    Rajesh

    • fionalindberrg's avatar
      fionalindberrg
      Regular Visitor

      Thanks Rajesh, which platform can I find Phillip Burton's course?

      • RajeshM's avatar
        RajeshM
        Advocate II

        Hi fionalindberrg, his courses are on Udemy. There are many equally good ones. I just happened to follow his.

  • Hi fionalindberrg 

     

    I would highly recommend making sure that you have got hands on experience as that can often help you with regards to the questions to understand what they are actually asking when you have the experience required.

  • Yup. Same. On top of that, it's difficult to find actually useful resources anywhere that match that specific exam. I feel like this one is very different, because it's such a mesh of just so many different softwares with endless details about how they interact and limitations and the like. I spent weeks and wrote hundreds of pages of notes trying to build a complete knowledge base to just learn, but even then the exam had about 50% of content that I had never seen before; not in real life as a BI consultant, not when going through the microsoft learn path, not in the documentation, not in YouTube videos, not in CertiAce, not in skillcertpro ... I think you get the point. If only the microsoft learn path would actually be complete with regards to the actual expectations of the exam authors. It seems like those two departments have a lot of distance between them.

  • btw - I recently found this YouTube course, 11 hours. Excellent course and I did most of the exercises. Hope this helps people. I plan on taking it again before the end of the year. 

    https://youtu.be/jTDSP7KBavI?si=8x3ZlOknEFJESVPv   

  • nbhanu's avatar
    nbhanu
    Frequent Visitor

     

    Hi fionalindberrg​ 

    Hope this helps too.

    This below video covers the Question for the DP-700 exam with a detailed explanation.

    https://youtu.be/XHDYaqg86Qc?si=hihtKShIBzZgGpXv

     

    This below video cover each section of the DP-700 Study Guide

    https://youtu.be/KiB4eAeFRsw?si=8TJtJl96LuhxxVIv  

     

    Thank you and all the best !